WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "2b701654-e126-4c63-b3f0-26677c3a4d57"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 2, "id": "25676", "owners": [2], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "25676"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:twcu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00025676", "sets": ["3249"]}, "author_link": ["12453"], "item_10002_alternative_title_24": {"attribute_name": "タイトル(別表記)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "TECHNIQUE AND PRODUCTION : FROM HEIDEGGER TO MARX"}]}, "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1996-09-20", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicPageEnd": "23", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "47", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "東京女子大学紀要論集"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The significance of Heidegger\u0027s philosophy might be evaluated in terms of the \"ontological turn\" he gave to the phenomenological movement. In this essay, I attempt to show that this conversion as performed by Heidegger, is a repetition of another \"great event\" in philosophical history-Marx\u0027s reversal of dialectical thinking. In his famous essay \"The Question Concerning Technique,\" Heidegger inquires in the essence of modern technique. According to his etymology, the word \"technique\" (tekhne), like the word \"production\" (poiesis), originally meant a mode of revealing (aletheuein). From such a aletheological point of view, Heidegger interprets the specific mode of modern technique as \"Herausfordern\" (challenging), by means of which anything on earth can become \"Bestand\" (stock). The claimant of this requisition is no longer an individual man, but some impersonal system of accumulation. Heidegger names this system the \"Gestell\" (gatheringsetting). When examined closely, the term \"Herausfordern\" is found to be equivalent to the key Marxian concept \"Ausbeuten\" (exploitation). Moreover, \"Gestell\" proves to be just another name for the monstrous master of the modern age, Capitalism. It is not accidental that we also encounter a question concerning technique in Marx\u0027s Capital. The subject of this book is \"the capitalistic mode of production,\" so that Marx examines essentially the same modern technique, to which capitalism owes the development of its productive force. Guided by Marx\u0027s critique of the \"economy of time,\" we can attain insight into the problems of the \"technology of time.\" That is why Capital is still one of the most important philosophical approaches to the essence of technology.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "NCID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00161550", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_text_25": {"attribute_name": "著者名ヨミ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "モリ, イチロウ"}]}, "item_10002_text_4": {"attribute_name": "著者名(別表記)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "MORI, Ichiro"}]}, "item_10002_text_6": {"attribute_name": "コンテンツの種類", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "紀要論文"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "森, 一郎"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "12453", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-07-25"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00004475622.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.2 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1200000.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00004475622.pdf", "url": "https://twcu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/25676/files/KJ00004475622.pdf"}, "version_id": "9205ed9f-d554-48f3-ab38-e9a7ce38f0cb"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "技術と生産 : ハイデガーからマルクスへ", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "技術と生産 : ハイデガーからマルクスへ"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "2", "path": ["3249"], "permalink_uri": "https://twcu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/25676", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2014-03-04"}, "publish_date": "2014-03-04", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "25676", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["技術と生産 : ハイデガーからマルクスへ"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
技術と生産 : ハイデガーからマルクスへ
https://twcu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/25676
https://twcu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2567679fe465d-34ea-492e-8123-4be32886d729
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00004475622.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2014-03-04 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 技術と生産 : ハイデガーからマルクスへ | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
タイトル(別表記) | ||||||
その他のタイトル | TECHNIQUE AND PRODUCTION : FROM HEIDEGGER TO MARX | |||||
著者 |
森, 一郎
× 森, 一郎 |
|||||
著者名ヨミ | ||||||
値 | モリ, イチロウ | |||||
著者名(別表記) | ||||||
値 | MORI, Ichiro | |||||
内容 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | The significance of Heidegger's philosophy might be evaluated in terms of the "ontological turn" he gave to the phenomenological movement. In this essay, I attempt to show that this conversion as performed by Heidegger, is a repetition of another "great event" in philosophical history-Marx's reversal of dialectical thinking. In his famous essay "The Question Concerning Technique," Heidegger inquires in the essence of modern technique. According to his etymology, the word "technique" (tekhne), like the word "production" (poiesis), originally meant a mode of revealing (aletheuein). From such a aletheological point of view, Heidegger interprets the specific mode of modern technique as "Herausfordern" (challenging), by means of which anything on earth can become "Bestand" (stock). The claimant of this requisition is no longer an individual man, but some impersonal system of accumulation. Heidegger names this system the "Gestell" (gatheringsetting). When examined closely, the term "Herausfordern" is found to be equivalent to the key Marxian concept "Ausbeuten" (exploitation). Moreover, "Gestell" proves to be just another name for the monstrous master of the modern age, Capitalism. It is not accidental that we also encounter a question concerning technique in Marx's Capital. The subject of this book is "the capitalistic mode of production," so that Marx examines essentially the same modern technique, to which capitalism owes the development of its productive force. Guided by Marx's critique of the "economy of time," we can attain insight into the problems of the "technology of time." That is why Capital is still one of the most important philosophical approaches to the essence of technology. | |||||
コンテンツの種類 | ||||||
値 | 紀要論文 | |||||
NCID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00161550 | |||||
書誌情報 |
東京女子大学紀要論集 巻 47, 号 1, p. 1-23, 発行日 1996-09-20 |