@article{oai:twcu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00025499,
 author = {森, 一郎},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {東京女子大学紀要論集},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {It is said that the twentieth century is a century of wars and revolutions. We are indeed forced to wonder how philosophical reflection is possible after Auschwitz and Hiroshima. In this respect, or retrospect, it seems appropriate to ask: to what degree could Nietzsche, who died just in 1900, be looked upon as a foresear of these hundred years full of disasters? In Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Nietzsche seems to declare that not peace but battle is good and just. Therefore he has often been regarded as a militarist - or even as a fascist. While it was the so-called agonal spirit, especially in pursuit of truth, that he wished to emphasize, Nietzsche actually warned that peace, i.e., a period of no war is liable to frustrate many people, causing them to be pathologically driven to "domestic violence." Nevertheless, in another remarkable text, The Wanderer and His Shadow, Nietzsche rejects not only both aggressive and defensive war, but also the very idea of armed peace in general, on the ground that a standing army reacts against people's peace of mind. Here he speaks as a peace advocate, more radical than Kant. Nietzsche eventually asserts that we should prefer to suffer an injury rather than to do an injury. To our Surprise, this principle of absolute peace originated in Socratic irony.},
 pages = {1--29},
 title = {ニーチェと戦争論},
 volume = {51},
 year = {2000}
}